Wed, 16 May, 2012, 3:28 PM EDT - Canadian Markets close in 32 mins.

6 big Canada Pension Plan changes coming in 2012

New rules could affect retirement planning.

Last week in a speech in Davos, Switzerland, Prime Minister Stephen Harper lit a political powder keg when he hinted at possible changes to Old Age Security benefits.

He was quick to point out that the Canada Pension Plan is "fully funded, actuarially sound and does not need to be changed," but a close look at the plan shows some alterations to the CPP are already under way.

    MORE RELATED TO THIS STORY
            Savings: Don't shortchange the later years
            How to save enough for retirement
            7 steps to reach your retirement goals

The rules governing the Canada Pension Plan are updated regularly, but most years the changes are limited to simple increases to benefit payments and premiums. Not this year.

Ottawa is bringing in a raft of new or tweaked policies to reflect that retirement these days is more of a gradual transition for many people rather than a single event. Many of these changes either begin in 2012 or are entering the next phase-in period, and they'll have a direct impact on the retirement plans of Canadians. [More: RRSP Season: How to make the most out of your investments]

In some cases, the changes are big enough that people nearing retirement may want to have a chat with a financial adviser before deciding exactly when to apply for a CPP retirement pension.

Early CPP, lower benefits

The first change involves payment rates.

People can choose to take a CPP retirement pension as early as age 60. But there's a catch – a 0.5 per cent reduction in the pension payout for each month before age 65 that someone begins receiving it. That translates into a retirement benefit that's 30 per cent less at age 60 that it would be if you waited until 65.

Starting in 2012, Ottawa is beginning to phase in a bigger reduction to get that early access.

For 2012, the penalty rises to 0.52 per cent per month – or a 31.2 per cent reduction for someone who starts receiving their retirement pension at age 60.

The early-bird reduction will continue to rise until 2016, when it hits 0.6 per cent per month, or a maximum 36 per cent reduction for those who start receiving CPP payments at age 60 rather than waiting until they reach 65. [More: Many Canadians' retirement plans in dire need of reality check]

Later CPP, bigger benefits

Similarly, those who wait until after the age of 65 to start collection CPP will get a bigger increase in their retirement benefit.

Before 2011, the rules stated that the CPP retirement benefit was boosted by 0.5 per cent for each month after age 65 that an individual put off receiving it. So someone who waited until age 70 would enjoy a 30 per cent boost in their payments.

But starting in 2011, the government began to phase in a gradual increase to that delay bonus.

For 2012, the increase for each month after 65 that a person delays applying for CPP goes to 0.64 per cent – or a maximum increase of 38.4 per cent for those who start receiving a pension at age 70. By 2013, the maximum bonus moves to 42 per cent.

These changes won't affect people who are already receiving CPP benefits. They are being made, according to Service Canada, to restore these adjustments to "actuarially fair levels," so there are "no unfair advantages or disadvantages to early or late take-up of CPP retirement benefits." [More: 8 things your need to know about RRSPs]

Drop-out years increase

Canadians currently don't need to contribute to the CPP every year from age 18 to age 65 to get a full CPP retirement pension. When someone's average earnings over their contributory period are calculated, 15 per cent of their lowest earning years are automatically ignored when the calculation is made. For someone who takes their CPP retirement pension at age 65, that means seven years of low or zero earnings are dropped from the equation.

But starting in 2012, that "general drop-out provision," as it's called, goes up to 16 per cent.

For someone eligible for CPP benefits in 2012, that will allow up to 7.5 years of the lowest earnings to be excluded from the calculations – boosting the retirement benefit paid.

In 2014, the percentage will rise again to 17 per cent, which will allow up to eight years of low earnings to be dropped.

These changes can really benefit people who entered the workforce late, who were unemployed for a long time, or took time off to go back to school.

One point to note is that there are separate drop-out provisions specifically for time spent out of the workforce because of disability or to have children.

'Work cessation test' dropped

CPP rules used to require that someone stop or drastically reduce the amount they earned during the two consecutive months before they began to receive a CPP retirement pension.

This was, for many Canadians, an annoying and costly requirement – especially since so many people now ease into retirement instead of stopping work completely.

Now, that rule is history. Beginning in 2012, the "work cessation test" has been eliminated. [More: Canadians get poor grades for retirement savings]

Post-retirement benefits

There's another rule change that's important for semi-retirees to be aware of. Before 2012, if someone started receiving a CPP retirement pension early – say, at age 62 – they didn't have to make any CPP contributions if they decided to collect payments but also keep working after age 62.

Starting this year, if you are under age 65 and continue to work while also drawing a retirement pension, you and your employer must make CPP contributions.

The good news for employees is that these extra contributions will be credited to what's called a Post-Retirement Benefit (PRB), which will result in a higher CPP retirement pension in the year after you make contributions to your PRB. This measure is a nod to the reality that many "retired" Canadians are still working.

Canadians who continue working after age 65 and are receiving a retirement benefit will have the choice of whether or not they want to make CPP contributions. If they choose to make them, their employer must kick in their share too. Those additional contributions will go towards higher benefits beginning the year after the PRB contributions.

Premiums and benefits rise

CPP benefits are always adjusted to reflect the rising cost of living. For 2012, the increase in benefits is 2.8 per cent. That will bring the maximum monthly CPP retirement pension to $986.67.

Contribution rates are unchanged. But since the yearly earnings maximum that the rate applies to is going up, the maximum annual contribution will rise by about $89 in 2012 to $2,306.70 for both employees and employers.

Market Data

  • Currencies
    Currencies
    NamePriceChange% Chg
    0.9882-0.01-0.51%
    CADUSD=X
    0.7767-0.00-0.43%
    CADEUR=X
    0.62090.00+0.01%
    CADGBP=X
  • Commodities
    Commodities
    NamePriceChange% Chg
    97.410004-1.41-1.43%
    CLZ11.NYM
    3.50-0.09-2.51%
    NGX11.NYM
    1,652.00-70.70-4.10%
    GCV11.CMX
    35.3150.22+0.63%
    SIV11.CMX
  • Popular Stocks
    Popular Stocks
    NamePriceChange% Chg
    542.19-10.98-1.98%
    AAPL
    11.150.05+0.45%
    RIMM
    628.9617.85+2.92%
    GOOG
    10.210.06+0.59%
    F
    19.1150.72+3.89%
    GE
    22.64010.34+1.53%
    PFE
    2.8262-0.06-2.21%
    NOK
 
  • Mr Smith  •  Fort Lauderdale, United States  •  3 months ago
    I live in Northwestern Ontario, vacation every winter in Florida. We own modest enrgy efficient house that is ours. Never had a mortgage. Allways build homes ourself what we could afford. Never bought anything on payments. Missed a lots of toys some neighbours had. Their toys got old and broke down, we saved the money from our small income.

    We are living on CPP, OAS for both of us and a small few hundred dollars monthly private pension. We don't use our savings for other than at winter in Florida expenses.

    If you guys budget right all your life, don't buy what you can't afford to pay cash for, life is good on very modest income. Us seniors we don't ask for much. Leave my pensions alone. I have earned them.
    • john 3 months ago
      If you are over 50 this current debate does not affect you in any way whatsoever.!
  • Oryst  •  Brampton, Ontario  •  3 months ago
    I am on the cusp of retiring this year at the age of 60 in July with the intent of collecting my CPP benefit until the decision by the Conservative Government to penalize me at the rate of 0.5% per month upto the age of 65. A reduction of 30% in total. Work for 37 years, pay taxes, support the economy, build this country...........just to get screwed in the end.
    Tax dollars being redirected to the costly Immigration programs.
    Read the Saturday Sun paper, Salim Mansur's column, page 23....it explains it all. A must read.

    Thank Mr Harper and the Conservative Government.
    NEVER, I REPEAT NEVER will I ever support the Conservatives in future elections. Upset........Damn right.
    • Willy Pen 3 months ago
      To be fair to the Conservatives the policies for the last 30 years have not all being Conservative. They knew we were going to run into this problem 30 years ago and should have buffered for this instead of using our pension money as a slush fund for every government program. What I do have a problem with is that Mr. Harper should have put this on the table last election so we could have made an intelligent decision on who we wanted to vote for.
  • cn  •  Ajax, Ontario  •  3 months ago
    Retirement benefits should be same for ALL CANADIANS INCLUDING MP'S/MPP'S, PM/Premiers and everyone else. Why they enjoy all extra benefits compared to rest of us who work all our lives to get what we get. It appears these beneficiaries do not have their own conciseness. Though I am not a lawyer, does this not fall under Canadian rights and freedom, Canadian human rights and discrimination clauses.
    Can we all jointly fix this system?
    • LEONARD ANTOSH 3 months ago
      Sorry, but that thinking is flawed. Your mixing CPP up with employer pensions. Employer pensions (& other benefits) depend on your career and are usually agreed upon in a contract or agreement. Certain employers are bound to have better pensions than others. ex. Nurses, doctors, bank staff have better employer pensions than MacDonald staff or Home Depot staff. The better the job, the better the pension. MP/MPP/PM/Premier pensions are the same as employer pensions, the employer being the federal or provincial government.

      CPP is a government sponsored pension based on contributions (which is fair) and time worked, that everyone has.
    • Invisibility Cloak 3 months ago
      Another flawed component of your argument. You say that all Canadians should be provided with the same retirement benefits (regardless of place of birth, length of time living in Canada-some citizens are naturalized).

      Certainly native born Canadians who worked here their entire lives paying into the Canadian pension should be given more than elderly folk who come here from the developing world having not contributed a single dime to the Canadian tax base (yes, they do expect to be given a pension within ten years of coming here).
    • dust 3 months ago
      @LEONARD ANTOSH - I believe what Cn wants to say is that if your Personal Retirement Plan provides you with an equal OR greater amount of that you will be receiving after you retire, then it is justifiable to refuse the OAS, the CPP - or both - to that individual. I hardly think anybody with an income higher that $250.000/year would really need that income.
  • canadian  •  3 months ago
    how much do the prime ministers and all their "cronies" collect for pensions ? i can bet its well exceeds the $986.67 per month after harpers done with it !
    • cn 3 months ago
      They get full pension for rest of their lives even after one/two terms in office. They also get retirement allowance even after they loose elections.,
    • Mark 3 months ago
      Harper has nothing to do with it. Those pensions have always been far too generous.
    • Cory 3 months ago
      Some of these fools or should I say Liberal freaks think that its all Harper doing this. THe government has received money like this always. People actually believe that the Liberals will make things better lol people forget so easily.
  • RoseMarie  •  Timmins, Ontario  •  3 months ago
    One comment on giving money to immigrants. Most immigrants are getting paid much more than a person on CPP and OAS. The government need to ban any further immigrants to this country. This is where all the money is going to provide them with housing, our jobs and health care.
    • A Yahoo! User 3 months ago
      Ban! They've already messed it up!Good Morning!
  • Helen  •  Barrie, Ontario  •  3 months ago
    I am not worried, I'm in the Freedom 95 plan!!
  • zoey z  •  Toronto, Ontario  •  3 months ago
    Screw with the pensions Harper and you will not last your term in office.
  • Trent  •  Kitchener, Ontario  •  3 months ago
    Here's a great idea, get rid of Indexed pensions for all Government employees and make them get there benefits after they turn 67 also. This includes Senators, politicians. There is no such thing in the private sector.

    While we are at it, lets get rid of Pensions for people who havent worked here all their lives and actually contributed to the plan. So if people from other countries move here and bring their parents, they get nothing...zippo..no healthcare either unless they have worked at least 15 years. Our kids will be the ones footing the bill, so its time to clamp down.
  • choppy61  •  Edmonton, Alberta  •  3 months ago
    In my opinion you shouldn't be able to collect a pension in this country unless you've been a Canadian citizen for 30 yrs not 10! And there is no way in HELL we should have to pay our government officials millions in pensions for being in office a term or 2! How they justify and get away with this is baffling! Once again the government caters to themselves and immigrants out of our pockets, the real Canadians who have paid into it ALL OUR LIVES including federal and provincial TAXES! We have also paid into EI all our lives and immigrants take advantage of that too! Their going to kill Canada by sucking our system dry and our grand children will be the ones to suffer and lose everything WE true Canadians have worked so long and hard for!! Might as well call this country Canastan!

    Shit, hope I didnt give the immigrants and idea there because before you know it...poof...it will be Canastan because the immigrants are offended by the name Canada!
  • Dan  •  Wakefield, New Brunswick  •  3 months ago
    Take it out early you may not live to be 65
  • Cuke  •  Mississauga, Ontario  •  3 months ago
    if we were not giving pension money to immigrants who have never worked a day in Canada then there would be more left in the pot for the people who have worked all their lives.
  • jblac25  •  White Rock, British Columbia  •  3 months ago
    Don't worry the government pigs at the trough will make sure in enact the "right to die" at 65 yrs of age so that you never get to recieve your pension....it's ok that they serve 2 terms and they can feed off the rest of us for life..The immigration pension laws are a joke and must be changed..."You don't work here you don't collect the money We who have worked for it actually earned it!!!! Time for Canadians to revolt...anyone wanting to setup something let the rest of us know what can be done to go after these fat cats...
  • Tim  •  3 months ago
    I cannot imagine someone working beyond 65...life is just to short. I paid into cpp for years and let me tell you, it has to be the worst investment return one could ever make. In fact, it is a joke. In my opinion, alot of hoopala about nothing. Unless your an actuary, you probably do not have a clue of what they are talking about and for the few dollars here and there, I suggest retiring when you feel like it...
  • Stewart  •  Magog, Quebec  •  3 months ago
    well you know I wonder, ;..........baby boomer demographics have been known for quite some time now, so couldn't there have been some earllier planning say , 30 yers ago , or is this the result of the same old 4 year re election stuff only ; and avoidance of meaningful decisions........... . fast flying jets may not be too popular in comparison ;especially as their price rises much faster than anyone could think of; in relation to pension repayment obligations ??
  • BRAD  •  Brantford, Ontario  •  3 months ago
    They sure as hell don't care about us little guys.They will get their big fat pensions.
  • james  •  Pompano Beach, United States  •  3 months ago
    You know its not surprising, I just wonder if all you complainers voted in the last election? The way I see it is you never and if you did it was for this present Goverment, get smart vote and get him out!
  • harold  •  Toronto, Ontario  •  3 months ago
    Harper should lead by example and cut government officials pensions by the same percentages. Whats good for the goose should be food for the gander. It not then we need to send a message, call for a election and let the voters decide whats best for them.
  • billystraw@r...  •  Greater Sudbury, Ontario  •  3 months ago
    Thats what you deserve for voting conservative...er Reform
  • Rosie  •  Kitchener, Ontario  •  3 months ago
    I'm tired of the government taking away from the general populus...wonder if they would like it if the shoe was on the other foot...I think not!
  • Aquarian  •  Abbotsford, British Columbia  •  3 months ago
    You know....here is what I'm thinking: why don't we go straight from the work force to the grave for Goodness sake? To raise the retiring age to 65 is one bad idea. What is left for you to do after 65? How can you even enjoy the tiny beeny life that's left for you to live if you retire so late? How about hitting on banks, lawyers and other categories that make a killing with their pay, bonuses and extra money and leave the people who live in poverty alone. I suggest that Mr. Harper goes and sees for himself how it is to live on a low income and then come back and make the changes that he's making.
    Again hitting on the poor and defenseless. Will Mr. Harper live on a reduced pension when EVERYTHING is getting more and more expensive now a days and when companies such as BC Hydro, Terasen, Skytrain and many others have jacked up their prices on services? Let these people at least live their last years in dignity, Mr. Harper.